New Poetry with Audio!

Donald Revell
Stephen Burt
Paul Hoover
Jonah Winter
Cathy Wagner
Reginald Shepherd
Nin Andrews
Sophia Kartsonis
Sandra Miller
Joshua Harmon
Devin Johnston
Chuck Zerby
Sara Henning
Ognjen Smiljanic
Lance Phillips
Peter Drake
Kathleen Byrne
Ernest Hilbert
Garth Greenwell
Marc McKee

Criticism

Brian Henry on Kinsella
Gabriel Welsch on Northrop
Gabriel Welsch on Smith
Cecily Iddings on Ruefle
Christopher McDermott on Wenderoth

Upon its 3rd Anniversary

 

Letter’s to Wendy’s by Joe Wenderoth. Verse Press, 2000. 300 pp. $14.

 

 

In his Diary of an Unknown, Jean Cocteau discussed German documentary films of the plant kingdom that were banned in France, judged to be pornographic because “the screen was invaded by images of sucking, male members, vulvas, sperm, and orgasms”:

 

When these images are projected at the correct speed, they reveal proof that the plant kingdom leads a highly turbulent, artful, erotic, and cruel existence. A disparity between its rhythm and our own had concealed this life from us, had beguiled us concerning the plant kingdom and its feigned serenity.  Which leads us to conclude that all that we hold solid, stable and inert swarms and ferments; that some inconceivably fast camera could reveal matter as it is, and show us nothing but wild rutting, hidden vices, opposites devouring each other, a vortex of attraction.

 

Joe Wenderoth’s Letters to Wendy’s creates such a vortex, where Cocteau’s motto “to disturb” reigns, and where the seedy underbelly in question is the human and animal kingdom of a fast-food chain. The author of two previous accomplished yet largely ignored books of poetry, Disfortune and It Is If I Speak, Wenderoth tackles the invisibility of the poet and the invisibility of the individual confronting the corporation.  “TELL US ABOUT YOUR VISIT” and “WE CARE” beckon the customer comment cards, but what if the customer were not to compromise in order to say the expected?  What if the customer were to be truthful?

 

In a world largely controlled by marketing professionals, where packaging a product has assumed the chief importance, a search for the truth of that product and what’s behind it is a subversive act.  What one finds is bound to go beyond the pale of what’s relevant to quality control. Wenderoth’s speaker continually debates how much of what happens at Wendy’s is being hidden:

 

The great thing about Wendy’s—one of the great things—

is that no one ever has sex in this space. It’s like sex is too

selfish an activity to go on here. To be in Wendy’s is to

understand that there can be no one other; it is to disabuse

oneself of that foolish hope, and thereby resume the animal

in its more lonely, more mobbed mode of comportment.

 

The tone of this early letter, the book’s seventh, gives way to greater and greater despair and loneliness. In a consumer culture where much of human intercourse happens through financial transactions, Wenderoth’s speaker wants to know and be known where so little can be revealed. Where does one begin to look? For Wenderoth, as with the plant documentarians, there must be somewhere hidden sex and violence. The intensity of Wenderoth’s approach is reminiscent of Emily Dickinson, and it’s interesting to consider in this context her poem, “I like a look of agony, / Because I know it’s true; / Men do not sham convulsion, / Nor simulate a throe. // The eyes glaze once, and that is death. / Impossible to feign / The beads upon the forehead / By homely anguish strung.” Wenderoth appears to revise her poem with the following entry:

 

I sort of recognize your employees, but not so much as

you’d think. I believe they recognize me. When I think

about it, the faces that really stay etched in my mind are the

faces of porn stars. Only in porn, it seems, does a face

acquire the peculiar glow of its ownmost rhythmic

ambiguity. It’s sad to everyday come to Wendy’s and see

faces that will never be given to me in their full porn depth.

 

Does Wenderoth’s speaker believe that pornography is less of a staged act and more of a revealed truth? It may be as confusing an issue as the nature films were shocking to early viewers. Such things are bound to get confusing for an alienated person, to whom the words “WE CARE” are not sincere. The individual, being disposable, should at least be useful if he wants to participate:

 

We’ve become a throw-away society! they gasp. Well, could

this be because we’ve discovered, finally, that we’re a throw-

away organism…living in a throw-away land? I think it’s

just this discovery that’s prompted so much righteous

organization against “waste.” I’m happy to every day get a

brand new ornate yellow cup, drink half my Coke, then

abandon the thing altogether and forever.

 

Wenderoth’s speaker’s knowledge that he will be thrown away allows him a fearlessness that would make him truly dangerous if anyone were paying attention.  Since he does not speak the language of the focus group, his letters will go unanswered, if they are to be read at all, since “to disturb” becomes synonymous with “to be irrelevant.” His unrelenting adherence to the primal makes him imperceptible, or at most a curiosity, in a world where the cover-up is standard.  In the words of Cocteau,

 

The enigma of the visible and the invisible retains its enigmatic elegance.  It cannot be resolved in a world fascinated by factuality and possessed of no other resource.  It is not well-disposed toward commerce.  It follows a rhythm contradictory to that of society, since the social rhythm is merely an ancient rhythm all primped up.

 

 

 

Christopher McDermott writes from Athens, Ga.